Another bugfix : recent changes to enforce minqty to be >= ecordqty are actually incorrect as previously the system would round up minqty re-orders instead of rounding down : meaning minqty<ecordqty is functionally meaningful and system needs to allow users to key in such things.

In english:  If ecordqty= 10,  and you key in minqty of 2, the moment your stock goes down below 2 c9 will re-order 10 more.  So having parts where minqty=2 and ecordqty=10 does something and makes sense.